top of page

Finding Joy Amid Pain: Loving While Letting Go

  • Apr 26
  • 11 min read

Updated: May 18

One research team wired up romantic partners while they talked about a painful loss. The person telling the story actually became calmer; their stress hormones dropped. The listening partner’s stress went up instead — but afterward, the couple reported feeling closer to each other.[1]

Pain shared didn’t cancel love. It deepened it.


If you’re living with a chronically ill or aging dog, this might feel familiar. Your days are an odd mix of pill schedules and soft ears, bloodwork and belly rubs. You can laugh at a silly head tilt in the morning and, by evening, be Googling “when is it time to let go” with a knot in your chest.


This is the dual existence: loving while letting go.Not love now, loss later — but both at once.


A curly-haired dog looks pensively over a blue fence. Wilsons Health logo in the corner. Background is softly blurred.

This article is about that middle place. The long stretch where your dog is still here, still themselves in so many ways, and yet you’re already grieving. It’s not about “moving on.” It’s about learning how to live inside this overlap without feeling like you’re failing your dog or yourself.


Love and loss are not opposites


We’re often told a simple story: first there is love, then there is loss, and the two are separated by a clear event — a breakup, a death, a diagnosis.


Biology and psychology tell a different story.


The science of “love hurts”


Studies of human love show:

  • Early intense love raises cortisol (a stress hormone) to levels similar to those seen in anxiety.[4]

  • Brain scans of people deeply in love light up areas associated with reward and addiction, but also with pain processing.[4][5]

  • When people talk about personal loss with someone close, the emotional and physiological signals between them start to sync — heart rate patterns, stress responses — in ways that actually strengthen the relationship.[1]


Love and pain share circuitry. They are wired together.


Psychoanalytic thinkers go further: they describe emotional ambivalence — the idea that love and hate, or joy and pain, can coexist toward the same person (or dog) without canceling each other out.[6] It’s not a glitch in the system; it’s how attachment works when life is complicated.


Applied to your dog, this means:

  • You can adore them and still feel exhausted by their care.

  • You can be grateful they’re alive and also wish, secretly, that the hard parts were over.

  • You can feel relief at imagining their suffering ending — and feel guilty about that relief.


From a psychological perspective, this is not a moral failure. It’s ambivalence: the mind trying to hold two true things at once.


The “dual existence” of chronic care


When a dog develops a chronic condition or nears the end of life, time stops behaving normally. There is no clean “before” and “after.” There is a long, uneven middle.


You might recognize some of these experiences:

  • Celebrating a good appetite day while knowing the disease is still progressing.

  • Feeling closer to your dog than ever because of the care you’re giving — and more afraid than ever of losing them.

  • Being told by the vet that the condition is “manageable,” yet sensing that your life has quietly rearranged itself around medications, appointments, and watchfulness.


Researchers studying human relationships after trauma and loss describe something similar: stress-related growth. People report becoming more emotionally stable, more self-aware, even more capable of intimacy after painful endings — not because the pain disappears, but because they’re forced to reorganize their inner world around it.[3]


With a chronically ill dog, you’re doing that reorganization in real time, while they’re still lying next to you on the couch.


Why your feelings are so contradictory


It can help to name what’s happening inside you with some of the language researchers use.


1. Attachment under threat


Attachment theory, originally developed for human caregivers and children, explains why we feel so destabilized when a loved one is at risk.


When attachment is threatened:

  • The brain becomes hyper-focused on monitoring the loved one.

  • Small changes (a skipped meal, a longer nap) can feel enormous.

  • Emotional reactions swing between clinging (more tests, more treatments) and avoidance (not wanting to talk about “the end”).


In human trauma research, this mix of intense love and fear can lead to complex emotional patterns — guilt, hyper-responsibility, difficulty trusting one’s own judgment.[2] Dog caregivers often echo this: “If I miss a symptom, I’ll have failed them,” or “I don’t know if I’m keeping them here for them or for me.”


2. Ambivalence: love and distress in the same place


Psychoanalytic work on love and hate notes that the more important someone is to us, the more room there is for conflicting feelings.[6] Not because we’re unloving, but because:

  • They are central to our emotional life.

  • They are also the source (or symbol) of our current pain.


With a sick dog, the dog is both:

  • The creature you’d do anything for, and

  • The reason you’re waking up at 3 a.m. to clean up accidents, or spending savings on diagnostics, or rearranging your work life.


Ambivalence shows up as:

  • Snapping at a partner who suggests euthanasia — and secretly wondering if they’re right.

  • Feeling resentful of the time care takes — then immediately feeling ashamed for thinking it.

  • Loving the extra “bonus time” you have — and feeling haunted by the countdown you can’t see but can’t ignore.


From a scientific standpoint, this is expected. Love, when it’s entangled with ongoing threat, almost always brings ambivalence.[2][6]


3. Anticipatory grief


Although not always named in the research you’ll read in exam rooms, anticipatory grief is well documented in human medicine. It describes grieving before the actual loss happens.


In practice, that can look like:

  • Crying on the way to a vet appointment, even when you expect “good” news.

  • Feeling waves of sadness during perfectly ordinary moments — making coffee, walking past the leash hook.

  • Imagining the house without your dog and feeling disloyal for doing so.


This doesn’t mean you’re “giving up.” It means your mind is trying to integrate what it knows: that love here will end in loss, and that both are already present.


Woman with dog on shoulder, facing blue-orange backdrop. Text reads: "Chronic illness teaches you to read what the world overlooks." Button: Learn More.

Why talking about it helps (even when it hurts)


Remember the study where couples discussed a personal loss? The storyteller’s stress physiology calmed down, while the listener’s stress went up — but their sense of closeness increased.[1]


Two key takeaways for life with a sick dog:

  1. Telling your story regulates you. Putting your experience into words — to a friend, a therapist, a support group, even a journal — can lower your internal stress, make your feelings more coherent, and reduce the sense of being emotionally “flooded.”[1]

  2. Listening is real emotional labor. Whoever hears your story takes on some of that stress. That’s not a reason to stay silent; it’s a reason to choose your listeners thoughtfully and recognize that your vet, your partner, or your friend may also need support.


For dog owners, this means:

  • You’re not “burdening” people by talking about your dog. You’re inviting connection — and yes, it costs something, but it also builds something.

  • Your veterinarian is not just processing lab results; they’re often absorbing your grief. Many vets experience their own emotional strain and even burnout from this repeated exposure to client loss.


Open, honest conversations about both love and loss — not just about dosages and test results — can:

  • Reduce your sense of isolation.

  • Improve trust and shared decision-making with your vet.

  • Help you make sense of what’s happening, which research links to better adjustment after loss in human relationships.[3]


The ethics of “enough”: quality of life, hope, and guilt


Few decisions feel as heavy as choosing when to stop treatment or consider euthanasia. The research doesn’t offer neat answers, but it does help explain why the decision feels so morally loaded.


When love involves harm


Studies in human caregiving ask a hard question: can love and harm coexist? The answer, uncomfortably, is yes.[8]

  • A parent can love a child and still, through decisions or limitations, contribute to their suffering.

  • A partner can love someone and still stay too long in a damaging situation.


Translating this to dogs:

  • You can love your dog deeply and still, unintentionally, prolong their discomfort because you can’t bear to say goodbye.

  • You can love your dog deeply and still decide to end treatment earlier than others might, because your circumstances or your dog’s temperament make ongoing interventions feel unfair.


Neither possibility makes you a monster. It makes you a human being in an impossible position, trying to weigh quality of life vs. quantity of life with incomplete information and a heart that is anything but neutral.


The tension between hope and realism


In chronic care, there’s a constant pull:

  • Hope: Maybe the new medication will work. Maybe this setback is temporary.

  • Realism: The disease is progressive. The good days are getting rarer.


Living only in hope can slide into denial. Living only in realism can slide into despair. Most owners oscillate between the two.


Veterinary medicine, too, lives in this tension. Clinicians are trained to:

  • Offer options and maintain therapeutic optimism.

  • But also be honest about prognosis and suffering.


When time and economic pressures are tight, the emotional conversation — “What does a good day look like for your dog?” “What matters most to you both now?” — can get squeezed out.


If you feel like no one is naming the elephant in the room, that’s not because you’re missing something. It’s because our systems are not built to easily hold this duality, even though it’s everywhere.


How to live in the middle, not just wait for the end


There is no checklist that makes this easy. But there are ways of thinking that can make this middle space more livable, and sometimes even quietly beautiful.


These aren’t instructions; they’re orientations you can experiment with.


1. Shift from “fixing” to “accompanying”


In the early stages of illness, the goal is often to cure or control. Over time, that may shift to comfort and presence.


A useful mental reframe:

  • From: “My job is to keep my dog alive as long as possible.”

  • To: “My job is to accompany my dog as kindly as possible through whatever time we have.”


This doesn’t mean abandoning treatment. It means measuring success less by lab numbers and more by:

  • Is my dog still able to do some things they enjoy?

  • Do we still have moments of connection — eye contact, leaning in, relaxed sleep nearby?

  • Am I able to be emotionally present, at least some of the time, rather than constantly braced?


2. Make space for both joy and sorrow, on purpose


Research on post-breakup growth shows that people who can make sense of their loss — who can tell a coherent story that includes both what hurt and what they learned — cope better and build healthier relationships later on.[3]


You are in the middle of the story now. You don’t need a tidy narrative, but small rituals of acknowledgment can help:

  • Allow a few minutes each day where you consciously notice something you’re grateful for in your dog today — a small appetite, a tail wag, a quiet cuddle.

  • Also allow time (even five minutes) where you let yourself feel the sadness or fear without trying to fix it. You might think of it as “scheduled sorrow,” so it doesn’t have to leak into every moment.


Joy doesn’t disrespect the seriousness of what’s happening. Sorrow doesn’t negate the good hour you just had. They can sit next to each other.


3. Use your vet as a thought partner, not just a technician


Veterinary-client relationships are often at their best when both the medical and emotional realities are on the table.


Conversations you’re allowed to have with your vet (or vet nurse):

  • “I’m torn between wanting more time and worrying I’m asking too much of her. Can we talk about what her quality of life looks like from your perspective?”

  • “If this were your dog, what trade-offs would you be thinking about?”

  • “I’m struggling with guilt. Can you help me understand what suffering looks like in this condition?”


Most veterinarians know that your emotional state affects your decisions. Many feel relieved when owners name the hard feelings, because it lets them respond as whole people, not just as medical providers.


4. Protect your own emotional bandwidth


Caregivers in human medicine are known to develop compassion fatigue and burnout under chronic strain. Dog owners in long-term care situations report similar exhaustion, even if they don’t use those words.


Signs you may be reaching your edge include:

  • Numbness instead of sadness.

  • Irritability about small things unrelated to your dog.

  • Feeling trapped or resentful, then ashamed for feeling that way.


This doesn’t mean you love your dog less. It means your nervous system is overloaded.


Where possible, consider:

  • Rotating responsibilities with family or friends, even for small tasks.

  • Asking your vet team about practical supports (e.g., tech appointments for nail trims, telehealth check-ins) that reduce the load on you.

  • Giving yourself explicit “off-duty” moments where someone else watches the dog, or you simply step outside for a walk without the leash.


You are part of the care plan. Your well-being shapes the kind of presence you can offer.


Woman holding a pug against an orange and navy blue background. Text reads "The invisible labor of chronic dog caregiving lives in your nervous system too."

When the end draws closer


No article can tell you when it’s time. But understanding the emotional terrain can make the path, if not easier, at least less bewildering.


As decisions about euthanasia or stopping treatment approach, expect:

  • Intensified ambivalence: You may feel both “it’s too soon” and “it’s already too late” in the same hour.

  • Surges of doubt: Even after making a decision that aligns with your values, your mind may replay “what if” scenarios.

  • Moments of clarity: Owners often describe brief, steady moments where they “just knew.” These can coexist with later second-guessing.


In human research on loss, people who can link their choices to a sense of meaning — “I spared them further suffering,” “I honored their personality,” “I did the best I could with what I knew” — tend to fare better over time, even if the pain remains.[2][3]


Meaning doesn’t erase grief. It gives it a place to stand.


After: how love changes, not ends


Studies of romantic breakups show something quietly hopeful: many people report growth after loss — more self-knowledge, more emotional depth, sometimes more courage in future relationships.[3] Not because the relationship didn’t matter, but because it mattered so much that they had to rebuild themselves around the empty space it left.


With a dog, the bond is different, but the principle holds:

  • The routines you built — the way you learned to notice small changes, to advocate in vet offices, to be patient at 3 a.m. — don’t vanish. They become part of who you are.

  • The capacity you developed to hold joy and sorrow at the same time doesn’t disappear. It can make you gentler with yourself and others in future hard seasons.

  • The grief you feel is not evidence you “failed” to cope. It’s evidence that the relationship was real.


In psychoanalytic terms, love that survives loss becomes internalized: your dog continues to shape you from the inside, through memory, habits, even the way you talk to yourself.[6] That doesn’t make the house less quiet. But it does mean the story doesn’t end at the vet’s office door.


“I stopped waiting for the end — and started loving the middle”


Some owners describe a turning point that sounds like this:


“I realized I was spending every good day scanning for the next bad one. I was mentally rehearsing the goodbye over and over. At some point, I decided: the end will come either way. I don’t want to miss the middle.”


The science we’ve looked at doesn’t promise that choosing to “love the middle” will remove the pain. It suggests something subtler:

  • Talking about your loss, even while it’s still unfolding, can connect you more deeply to others.[1]

  • Making sense of what’s happening — including the parts you’re not proud of — can help you carry this experience into the rest of your life with less self-blame and more compassion.[2][3]

  • Love and loss are not two separate chapters. They are interleaved pages of the same story.


You are already living in that story: medicating and laughing, worrying and nuzzling, grieving and loving — often in the same five minutes.


Nothing about that makes your love less pure. If anything, it makes it more fully human.


You don’t have to choose between joy and pain right now. You are allowed to have both, to feel both, to talk about both. And in doing so, you’re not failing your dog.


You’re walking with them — all the way through the middle.


References


  1. Mancini AD, Bonanno GA, Kaltman S. What Happens When Romantic Couples Discuss Personal Loss: Emotional and Physiological Responses and Their Associations With Relationship Quality. Clinical Psychological Science. 2022. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9710234/  

  2. Pressler JA. When Love and Pain Coexist: Understanding the Complexity of Love and Trauma. Jessica Anne Pressler Blog. 2021. Available from: https://www.jessicaannepressler.com/blog/wvlxrydvqs7m402fakrz6de9zjf4vy  

  3. Slotter EB, Finkel EJ. Making Sense and Moving On: The Potential for Growth After Breakups. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2018. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6051550/  

  4. Raypole C. The Adverse Psychological Effects of Love. Medical News Today. 2019. Available from: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/324459  

  5. Acevedo BP. Conflict and Compromise in the Research of Romantic Love. CUNY Academic Works. 2015. Available from: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4966&context=gc_etds  

  6. Love and Hate (Psychoanalysis). Wikipedia. Last updated 2024. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_and_hate_(psychoanalysis)  

  7. Tronto J, et al. Taking Love and Care Seriously: A Research Agenda for International Studies. International Studies Review. 2022;24(1). Available from: https://academic.oup.com/isr/article/24/1/viac003/6527435  

  8. Dunn J, et al. Can Parental Love and Harm Coexist? Child & Family Social Work. Wiley Online Library. 2021. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.70023?af=R

Comments


bottom of page